A solid pair of Ecco waterproof hiking boots is an investment well worth making, whether you’re a beginner hiker or have hundreds of miles under your belt.
The brand offers many fashionable hiking/outdoor activity shoes that fall in the category of urban attire and outdoor gear, allowing you to be prepared for any adventure. However, in today’s article, I’ve decided to focus on two of their outdoor boots Ecco Track II Vs Track 25 to determine which is better:
Similarities and Differences between Ecco Track II Vs Track 25:
| Features | Ecco Track II | Ecco Track 25 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched in | 2000 | 1992 |
| Stability | Stable | More Stable |
| Flexibility | Less Flexible | Moderate Flexibility |
| Sizing | 5-16.5 for Men4-11.5 for women | 5-16.5 for Men4-11.5 for women |
| Weight | 14-15 oz. for a single shoe | 13-15 oz. for a single shoe |
| Cushion | Cushioned | Firm Cushioning |
| Outsole | Rubber | Non-Marking TPU |
| Insole | OrthoLite Inlay | OrthoLite Inlay |
| Midsole | Poly-Urethane | Poly-Urethane |
| Upper | Full Grain Leather | Breathable Yak Leather with Nubuck |
| Retail Price | $260-$290 | $240-$260 |
Ecco Track II Vs Track 25: Good, Bad, and the Worst:
Continue reading to get an in-depth analysis of the differences and similarities between the Ecco Track II Vs Track 25.
1) Comfort:
The brand Ecco incorporates the “Comfort Fiber System,” in Ecco Track ii and Track 25 which is based on their cutting-edge technology, allows the leather to breathe in warm weather to make it smooth & soft and actively circulates air on the foot throughout any activity. So when you move, the air pushes through microscopic holes in the foam’s lining, to keep your foot cool and dry.
Additionally, lengthy hours of hiking can be uncomfortable due to unpleasant foot odor.
The “GORE-TEX” interior of the ECCO Track II and Track 25 provides waterproof functionality without compromising breathability and comfort. This moisture-free material functions comparably to human skin, its membrane enables it to escape sweat molecules so that you can stroll for hours without any hassle.
However, if you need lightweight comfort, the Ecco Track 25 model allows for more freedom of movement than the Track II and also offers great arch support which is a crucial comfort component. Whereas the soles of Track II have a superior grip and a bit of additional cushioning in the heel which you require to stay on the feet for hours.
You can also Check Out our Comparison between Ecco Biom C4 and H4 HERE.
2) Popularity:
Ecco Track ii and Track 25 both are favorite choices among hikers more specifically Men, but The Ecco Track 25 is more popular as it has a long history and is based on the brand’s tradition of authenticity, quality, and love of the outdoors. Also, this model has more customer feedback and hype on the internet.
3) Running:
It is possible to run on any path while wearing both of these shoes but in our opinion, it is not a good idea to do so. Your ability to run will be restricted because these boots limit your range of motion, particularly in the foot and ankle areas.
Also, these shoes will not give you enough balance and control of the movement of running that specific trail running shoes offer.
4) Walking:
Ecco Track ii and Track 25, unlike regular walking shoes, are built to withstand the rigors of trekking over rugged terrain. Both of these models are heavier and bulkier than standard shoes and may wear out sooner with casual use.
However, the Ecco Track 25 bridges the distance between hiking and walking shoes, allowing for seamless transitions from street use to uneven surfaces.
5) Flat Feet:
If you have flat feet, Ecco Track 25 will give you a pleasant and pain-free experience if you are planning to go on high altitudes carrying a heavy backpack. Due to additional arch support, you can confidently trek in these without worrying about pressure on your legs from back pain.
6) Design:
Ecco Track II has a robust Oxford design that can be worn at any time of the year, in any climate, and comes in both low and high silhouettes.
The uppers of these shoes are made of full-grain leather and its water-repellent technology protects your feet from unexpected weather elements. This sturdy yet flexible fabric will soften up fast and become more comfortable for long-lasting wear. Also, its ability to withstand abrasion protects it from rips and tears caused by rough use.
Moreover, the insoles of the Ecco Track II are designed to shape the wearer’s foot over time for a fully personalized fit. However, these insoles are less durable and will likely wear out sooner but the good thing is you can swap it for a new one as it is removable to make these last even longer.
On the whole, the Ecco Track II is an adaptable alternative that works well for active use in the great outdoors.
On the other hand, the Ecco Track 25 satisfies the needs of hikers and walkers alike by providing a comfortable ride on a variety of surfaces, from paved roads to parks to moderately rocky paths. Their grippy and rugged soles enhance the fine craftsmanship of their uppers, which are handcrafted from carefully chosen animal skins (yak leather).
Additionally, the Ecco Track 25 Boot’s non-marking, oil- and slip-resistant TPU outsole ensures secure traction in all directions making the shoes more stable.
The combination of nubuck and full-grain leather makes these shoes stylish enough for everyday use, while the waterproof technology gives you the confidence to venture out in the rain knowing that your feet will stay dry and cozy all day long.
What do customers think?
The true reason so many people praise the Ecco Track II is not only its good looks or sturdy construction but also its extraordinary ease of wear. Some of them even said that they don’t feel the need to take them off after a long day.
A few adventurers have repurchased these shoes many times because they are travel-friendly and dependable in all weather conditions.
Nevertheless, some customers have reported that this model wears out very quickly and that the upper and sole merely separated after a short time.
Lastly, hikers don’t like how heavy Track II is, and they also expressed that it won’t be the best for supporting your feet.
Conversely, Ecco Track 25 for men and women is praised for its comfortable feel, ankle support, and lightweight.
People who go on trails say that the Track 25 Low has steady and smooth padding that gives a lot of comfort to the feet. While others are happy to say that this hiking shoe option is the most versatile ever and can work best for walking as well.
Moreover, Track 25 is adored by many for its endurance, as evidenced by comments such as “the durability of these shoes is unmatched” and few of them even said that it can last you a lifetime.
A significant number of hikers find the Ecco Track 25 to be exceptionally impermeable, and they concur that it provides full protection against wet terrain.
In short, despite its exorbitant price, the majority of the shoe’s owners consider this model to be a worthwhile investment due to its robust construction.
Conclusion: Which Is Better For You?
If you want to know the winner between Ecco Track II and Track 25, it may vary from person to person, as it mainly depends on the demand of the user.
From our point of view, casual hikers searching for a pair of boots with above-average waterproofing and outstanding grip can go for Ecco Track II but considering the high dollars of these shoes we will not recommend them due to less durability.
Alternately, the Ecco Track 25 is well-made, and because of its versatility, it can be worn anywhere from the city to the mountains. With its back support, cushion, and lightweight construction you’ll never want to replace these shoes anytime soon.
So, if you require sturdy leather hiking shoes with distinct explorer aesthetics for long days on your feet look no further than “ECCO Track 25”.