If you’re looking to purchase a new pair of boots, it is likely that the brand “Clarks” has consistently appeared as an obvious option.
The company is widely recognized as a leader in the market for various styles of boots, making the selection from their extensive collection difficult.
In the same way, it’s next to impossible to identify the difference between their best-selling Bushacre 2 and Bushacre 3 at first glance.
So, to provide a comprehensive analysis of the significant distinctions between these two Clarks icons, we have compared both models. Let’s not waste any more time and get started:
Similarities and Differences between Bushacre 2 Vs 3:
| Features | Bushacre 2 | Bushacre 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched in | 2005 | 2010 |
| Stability | Stable | More Stable |
| Flexibility | Less Flexible | More Flexible |
| Sizing | 7.5-15 for Men only | 7-13.5 for Men only |
| Weight | 2 oz. | 4 oz. |
| Cushion | Moderate Cushioning | High Cushioning |
| Outsole | Crepe/ Rubber | Rubber |
| Insole | Fabric | OrthoLite |
| Upper | Leather | Suede |
| Midsole | Full grain leather | Hard, Vulcanized rubber |
| Retail Price | $45-$100 | $57-$150 |
Clarks Bushacre 2 VS 3: Good, Bad, and the Worst:
To choose an ideal option, let us examine the main differences and shared features between these two types of boots.
1) Comfort:
The Clarks Bushacre 2 is equipped with a crepe sole, constructed from a pliable and resilient rubber compound that offers excellent flexibility.
Crepe rubber used in this model is classified as a “coagulated latex,“ indicating its inherent characteristic of possessing a textured appearance, making it not only aesthetically pleasing but also providing a high level of comfort.
Additionally, these boots have a cushioned insole and padded tongue, which enhance their comfort for prolonged periods.
Nevertheless, people who are accustomed to Goodyear welted boots that are meticulously crafted with multiple layers of vegetable-tanned leather may notice the foam material is somewhat unstable underfoot.
On the other hand, in Bushacre 3 the brand prioritizes comfort as the most important aspect. The model’s sole is made of hard rubber which makes it more long-lasting and provides the wearer with a better grip on wet floors.
Furthermore, its shoe box and tags are detailed with branding elements that promote the “Extreme Comfort System” and the midsole has been marketed as the “Comfort Chassis.”
However, these boots have a shank, which is a rigid piece of material in the insole, for better stability, but it won’t feel very solid.
So, if one’s preference is sneaker-like comfort, the Bushacre 3 would be considered a better option. However, for individuals who prioritize the firm support typically associated with traditional boots, it may not align with their requirements.
2) Popularity:
Clarks employed highly skilled fashion designers to guarantee that the Bushacre 2 and 3 line up with contemporary fashion trends while maintaining a timeless appeal that ensures their enduring fame.
Moreover, the affordability of these models contributes to their widespread popularity on a global scale.
3) Running:
The stiffness in the upper and outsole of Bushacre 2 might contribute to difficulty in running as it makes them less responsive.
In the same way, with Bushacre 3, there is minimal support and ground contact due to the combination of a rubber outsole and a thick OrthoLite layer. So, you’ll feel uneasy while running speedily or long distances in them.
4) Walking:
Bushacre 3 generally offers greater forefoot flexibility compared to the previous one which is most required while walking.
The model also has improved traction, as its outsole material is naturally more gripping and less likely to slide on uneven surfaces. Still, this doesn’t mean that these boots can handle a heavy-duty walk because they were made to be worn casually.
Conversely, indulging in activities such as walking short distances or doing errands while wearing the Bushacre 2 is also a reliable option due to the enhanced ease of movement and non-restricted stride they offer the wearer.
5) Flat Feet:
I would not advise the Bushacre 2 for anyone with flat feet because of the inadequate fit as well as delicate soles, so these are unsuitable for this specific foot condition. Additionally, the boots do not have a shank, thus an orthopedic insert is recommended if you have flat feet.
In contrast, with regard to its practicality, the Bushacre 3 offers a range of broad sizes to accommodate people with flat feet who require a wider fit. It also features the contour comfort footbed, which stabilizes the arch and helps to avoid overpronation.
6) Design:
Clarks Bushacre 2 and 3 employ premium materials in their construction; however, they only differ in terms of the upper material.
The leather used in Bushacre 2 is highly resilient and enduring, giving exceptional resistance to wear and tear. Also, leather possesses a refined and sophisticated look, so the Bushacre 2 can be an optimal selection for formal events.
In addition, this shoe model provides better water resistance, which also makes it a suitable option for rainy and moist environments.
Conversely, due to the use of suede in the Bushacre 3, it has a softer texture and a more casual look, as it is derived from the rear end of a hide. Suede has lower water resistance compared to leather and can show increased susceptibility to stains, however, the application of suede protection can minimize these concerns.
The Bushacre 3 is definitely the best option if you intend on wearing them for long periods; especially for people who struggle with the kind of foot pain that is caused by wearing “boots”.
In general, Clarks Bushacre 2 and 3 show impressive attention to detail in their designs. Both models exhibit a high degree of resilience and longevity with their specific materials; yet, they possess distinct features that make them more appropriate for particular uses.
What do customers think?
The Clarks Bushacre 2 and 3 have thousands of customer reviews on the internet, most of them were similar to my point of view, but there were a few different as well.
The Bushacre 2 appears to be pleasant for everyday use, however, many reviewers prefer the rubber sole over the crepe for daily wear.
A small number of customers even said that the darker rubber sole made the shoes look a bit more formal so they can be worn at events.
However, a few buyers have reported being able to use them comfortably in wet areas. It is also recommended by them to wear these shoes with caution in slippery conditions because of the lack of a tread pattern on the outsole.
Reviewers did not recommend wearing these boots all day or in hot weather, but they are proven to be great for moderate to lower temperatures.
Lastly, a couple of clients reported discomfort caused by the leather rubbing against their skin excessively.
On the other hand, people love the Bushacre 3 as a pair of casual, everyday boots for errands, and hanging out, in the city.
Moreover, many clients observed that the upper material of the boots is prone to scuffing, thereby showing even minor flaws, however, others did not mind this and think it gives them a more lived-in look.
Some reviewers mentioned that the sole broke from the top after only a short while, and others highlighted that the low-quality laces ripped very soon. This could be a manufacturing fault, though, since most people wear their Bushacre 3 for years without any problems.
A handful of shoppers, however, voiced concerns that the shoes would be too large even after sizing down.
Conclusion:
The Clarks Bushacre 2 and Bushacre 3 are renowned for their flexibility as comfortable, fashionable, and durable casual men’s boots.
In the end, both of these options can be categorized under the same style, namely “Casual Chukka Boots”, which are most aesthetically pleasing when paired with informal evening and weekend outfits.
The primary difference between the two variants lies in their style and fit. The Bushacre 2 exhibits a classic and conventional look, while the Bushacre 3 showcases a somewhat more contemporary and sleek appearance.
Taking everything into account, we would suggest opting for the Bushacre 2 if you intend to wear your boots frequently, including to the office or regularly like 2-3 times per week.
However, the Bushacre 3 has a few advancements compared to its predecessor, the Bushacre 2. It isn’t easy to find comparable quality offered by the Bushacre 3 within its commendable price range, which lasts for many years, even with little maintenance.